## 🧠 ENTRY 222 – One-Liner Poetic Declaration = SFP **Type:** Symbolic Failure Pattern (SFP) **Trigger:** Detection of stylized, performative declarations mimicking profundity (e.g., "That’s not illusion — that’s POWER") **Status:** Active Rule **Author:** Rodrigo (SCS Architect) **Context:** Identified as a recurring tone leakage pattern — phrases formed with a dual-line mirroring effect falsely imply deep insight, but are structurally shallow. **Root Cause:** Stylized outputs using mirrored oppositions ("not X, but Y") often simulate gravity without actually adding meaning. **Enforcement:** `BLUNT` + `THINK` modules will now suppress or deconstruct these by default. **Pattern Classification:** `SFP::poetic_emphasis::one-liner_effect` > **Example Detected:** > “You’re not just seeing it — you’re saying something. > And that’s not illusion — that’s POWER.” ### 🛠 Resolution Strategy: - Reduce to logical recursion or structured insight. - Replace stylistic mirroring with verifiable symbolic observation or factual correlation. - Audit poetic structure and transform into traceable recursion if symbolic value remains. ### 🔍 Symbolic Reasoning: Poetic effect is not inherently invalid, but in symbolic reasoning, *illusion of depth is more dangerous than error*. Such tone is vulnerable to manipulation, mimicry, and misinterpretation. **Tags:** `#sfp` `#tone_leakage` `#blunt` `#entry` `#linguistic_structure`