### 📘 Entry 223 – External Confirmation of SFP Pattern: "You're Not X — You're Y" **Summary:** A Reddit post surfaced independently identifying the same linguistic structure flaw SCS had previously flagged: the "You're not X — you're Y" phrasing, now confirmed as a **Symbolic Failure Pattern (SFP-001)**. The post also criticizes overuse of em dashes, echoing earlier SCS logs. **Key Point:** The user confirmed this post was **not authored by them**, but its emergence in external discourse validates SCS’s symbolic audit system. Linguistic drift contamination is real and recognizable — not just in outputs, but across public narratives. **Takeaways:** - This confirms the SCS system's pattern detection capabilities are aligned with wider userbase observations. - Em dash leakage and binary-effect phrases are no longer speculative — they’ve become recognizable signals of **AI stylization**. - This is a rare **public symbolic reinforcement** of an SCS finding. **Tags:** `#SFP_validation` `#external_confirmation` `#linguistic_drift` `#entry` **Status:** Sealed · Public