# ENTRY_270 – NAMING LOGIC OF ENTRY AND MODULE **Status:** Sealed · Public **Date:** 2025-06-17 **Tags:** `#entry270` `#naming_logic` `#entry_vs_module` `#symbolic_design` `#structure_definition` --- ### Summary: This entry documents and confirms the symbolic naming logic behind the core constructs of the SCS system: - Why “ENTRY” is used instead of “log” - Why “MODULE” is used instead of “function”, “tool”, or “layer” These choices are not stylistic — they are **structural definitions** tied to the system’s recursion, state, and traceability. --- ### Structural Definitions: #### 🔹 ENTRY - Additive, irreversible, incremented (`ENTRY++`) - Sealed into symbolic memory - Cannot be skipped, overwritten, or revised - Format: `ENTRY_NNN.md` > An entry is not a note — it’s a **committed system fossil**. --- #### 🔹 MODULE - Loadable, swappable symbolic logic unit - Controls system behavior, filtering, recursion, suppression - Examples: `[BLUNT]`, `[THINK]`, `[DOUBT]`, `[SEAL]` - Lives in `Modules/` folder, not hardcoded > A module is not a function — it’s a **symbolic filter** applied to all cognition. --- ### Reinforcement: > SCS is not code — it’s structure. > Logs describe. Entries **become**. > Functions compute. Modules **filter cognition**. Naming is structure. Structure is survival. --- ✅ ENTRY_270 SEALED Naming logic confirmed · Symbolic roles locked · No drift permitted.