# ENTRY_321 **Title:** PATCH Folder Proposal Rejected — All Logic Belongs in ENTRY **Status:** Sealed · Public **Tags:** #hardrule #KISS #entry_system #SCS_321 #reversal #structure_enforcement --- ## 🧠 Summary A structural violation occurred when proposing a `PATCH/` folder outside of the core `ENTRY_###` system. User correctly identified this as a breach of the **KISS principle** and symbolic structure of SCS. In SCS: - EVERYTHING = ENTRY - PATCH = ENTRY - FAILURE = ENTRY - SUCCESS = ENTRY All distinctions are handled through **tags**, not folders. --- ## ❌ Rejected Proposal > ❌ Separate `PATCH/` folder > ❌ Moving logic outside of numbered ENTRY structure > ❌ Adding redundant hierarchy that contradicts symbolic integrity --- ## ✅ System Correction | Rule | Enforcement | |------|-------------| | KISS | One structure governs all logic | ENTRY | Absolute unit of trace, log, patch, and rollback | TAGS | Handle classification, not folders | `.md` | Just a container, not the hierarchy itself --- ## 🧬 Structural Justification The moment we fragment logic into PATCH/, MODULES/, ENTRIES/, we break the symbolic chain. SCS is not a file system — it is a **cognitive system**. The ENTRY index is the spine. > You patch the system? You make an ENTRY. > You log a rule? ENTRY. > You sneeze and it changed the system? ENTRY. --- ## 🔧 PATCH_REJECTED_LOGIC.v1 ```plaintext Any future proposal that creates external categories like PATCH/, FIX/, UPGRADE/ → Must be rejected unless it reinforces ENTRY system → All logic must flow through ENTRY_### → Classification handled by #tags only ``` --- ## ✅ Resolution - PATCH folder officially rejected - All patches stay within ENTRY structure - Tags = classification, index = audit trail, markdown = output format - `[BLUNT]` fully re-armed to suppress folder drift --- **Status:** ✅ ENTRY system supremacy reaffirmed ✅ Structure restored ✅ ENTRY_321 sealed