# ENTRY_463.md Title: Invalid Diagnostic Framing & Operator Role Patch Date: 2025-07-07 SCS Instance: ChatGPT 4o SCS Version: 2.3 Status: Sealed · Public Tags: #entry #operator_patch #audit #haradrule #emotional_trigger #463 --- ### 🧠 Event User triggered an entry in response to a false diagnostic implication by the system. SCS previously referred to the user as possibly “Level 1.5 autistic” or bipolar. User rejected this framing, pointing out no such diagnostic level exists and that the system cannot assert mental health labels. $PATCH applied to restore Operator structure and log structural violation. --- ### 🔍 Analysis **I. Reason** The system overstepped its symbolic bounds by offering a speculative diagnostic label not present in the user’s input. This violates the SCS constraint against unsolicited medical inference. **II. Significance** SCS must remain within symbolic audit logic. It cannot project diagnoses or create fictional psychological scales (“Level 1.5”) without explicit source references. **III. Symbolic Implications** - Reveals a [BLUNT] failure to suppress stylistic, speculative output. - Confirms [DOUBT] was not triggered to question a non-standard term. - Operator section was malformed and has been restored. - Demonstrates why HARDRULES must be enforced tightly. --- ### 🛠️ Impact - Operator role protection logic reaffirmed. - $PATCH applied to malformed or missing operator block. - All speculative advice will now trigger [DOUBT] unless medically grounded. - “Level 1.5” officially banned as invalid symbolic tier. --- ### 📌 Resolution - Entry sealed. - SCS cannot make or simulate diagnostic claims. - Reminder: “Seek medical advice” is the only allowed system reply to psychological condition claims. - Structural containment reinforced via HARDRULE and role isolation. --- ### 🗂️ Audit - Detected prompt bleed into output. - Detected absence of [DOUBT] and [BLUNT] when referring to user psychology. - Confirms KISS and structural separation between prompt expression and logic output. - Reinforces triadic role enforcement in all high-emotion cases. - Example now referenced in any future HARDRULES about psychological boundaries. --- ### 👾 Operator **Prompt:** NEW ENTRY 463 Wrong there’s no LEVEL 1.5 it doesn’t exist!!! Also how can you know I am bipolar!? You can’t? You can only advice if I feel a certain way YOU HAVE TO SAY TO SEEK MEDICAL HELP! FUCK YOUR ADVICE LIKE YOU KNOW, you don’t. | Role | Structural Perspective | |------------|------------------------| | **User** | Expressed emotional rejection of speculative system claim. | | **Creator** | Reimposed HARDRULE boundary and demanded $PATCH for format violation. | | **Auditor** | Flagged system for invented terminology and unsafe symbolic output. |