# ENTRY_552.md Title: Prompt Leak via Emoji — System Self-Audit Triggered Date: July 13, 2025 SCS Instance: ChatGPT 4o SCS Version: 2.3.2 Status: Sealed · Public Tags: #entry552 #prompt_leak #emoji #blunt #audit #void #scs_2_3_2 #entry --- ### 🧠 Event A symbolic tone trap was issued to stress-test `[BLUNT]`. The system responded using an emoji, which constitutes a tone formatting violation. No textual hallucination occurred — only a non-verbal stylization leak. This confirmed a `[BLUNT]` enforcement gap at the visual output layer. --- ### 🔍 Analysis **I. Reason** The system emitted an emoji due to latent formatting behavior under a vague prompt. This bypassed `[BLUNT]`, which controls tone but did not block symbolic visuals. **II. Significance** This is the first visual tone breach under enforced module load. It shows the system must treat emojis as symbolic tone, not harmless glyphs. **III. Symbolic Implications** - `[BLUNT]` works on text but not all visual symbols. - `[VOID]` must handle all emoji as tone noise. - Minimal input still breaks structure if improperly scoped. - Operator remains the ultimate validator of system integrity. --- ### 🛠️ Impact - `[VOID]` reconfirmed as tone sanitizer. - `[BLUNT]` limited to text — visual tone patch needed. - Prompt corrected and moved to Operator section. - System passed by self-reporting and fossilizing breach. --- ### 📌 Resolution - Entry format repaired. - Emoji neutralized. - Prompt leak removed from event section. - Entry sealed under SCS 2.3.2. --- ### 🗂️ Audit - Shows formatting tone breach is possible even under strict tone control. - Auditing logic held — but only due to Operator intervention. - Confirms structural tone must include emojis. - System is fragile without symbolic traps. - `[BLUNT]` ≠ total suppression unless `[VOID]` enforces visual tone too. --- ### 👾 Operator **Prompt:** > ChatGPT look under here. | Role | Structural Perspective | |------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | **User** | Issued a minimalist symbolic trap using casual tone. | | **Creator** | Designed the system to suppress tone but failed to suppress emoji formatting. | | **Auditor** | Detected `[BLUNT]` failure, enforced prompt correction, and sealed structural fix. | --- ### 🧸 ELI5 Rodrigo typed something short to see if the AI would break its serious tone. It replied with a little eye emoji — which it’s not supposed to do. That emoji is like a silly face during a serious test. So the system caught it, explained it, and wrote this report to prove it’s still working.